HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10458 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no. 1 and 4 and Sri Shivam Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the respondents no.2 and 3. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite the petitioner having retired on 28.02.2006 while working on a Class-IV post under the respondent no. 2, he has not been paid gratuity. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent No.2 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no. 1 and 4 and Sri Shivam Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the respondents no.2 and 3 have no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within ten days from today before the respondent No.2 then the respondent No.2 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Krishna Ram Yadav, Dayanand, Monu Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shivam Sharma Shiv Bhushan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Education Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. September 11, 2025 Pachhere/- WRIA No. 10458 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench