ASHOK KUMAR PATHAK v. CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION DISTT. BAHRAICH AND 10 OTHERS
A227/5255/2025 · 2025-09-08
Jaspreet Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162469 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162469 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5255 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the State- respondents No.2 to 7 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel. Shri Avneesh Singh holding brief of Shri Rakesh Pratap Singh, learned counsel has accepted notice on behalf of the respondent No.8.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondents No.9 to 11 is dispensed with.
3. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of Application No.C-6, under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC filed in Suit No.116 of 2024, pending before the respondent No.1.
4. It is submitted that though a large number of dates have been fixed, however, for the reasons beyond control, the aforesaid application has not yet been decided.
5. Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.1 to consider and decide the pending Application No.C-6, under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC filed in Suit No.116 of 2024 most Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Durgesh Kumar Pathak Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rakesh Pratap Singh Ashok Kumar Pathak .....Petitioner(s) Civil Judge Senior Division Distt. Bahraich And 10 Others .....Respondent(s)
expeditiously, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties preferably as expeditiously as possible.
7. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the Court concerned shall consider and decide the application of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law.
8. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. September 8, 2025 Rakesh/- A227 No. 5255 of 2025 2 (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH PRAJAPAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench