HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10195 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent no.1 and Sri Akhilesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for respondents no.2 to 4. 2. With the consent of learned counsels for the parties, the writ petition is being decided finally. 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that despite he being entitled for being paid the dues of Assured Career Progression scheme the same have still not been paid to him. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before respondent no.4 which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned counsels appearing for respondents have no objection. 5. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.4 then respondent no.4 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shyam Narayan Shukla, Diwakar Pratap Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Akhilesh Kumar Srivastava Ashok Kumar Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Transport Deptt. Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 6. It is also provided that in case any amount is found due to the petitioner the same would also be paid to him within next four weeks. 7. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed off. 8. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. September 4, 2025 A. Katiyar WRIA No. 10195 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench