Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 162467 (ALL)

MUNEEB PRASAD v. VEENA KUMARI MEENA, PRIN. SECY. / ADDL. CHIEF SECY. AYUSH DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER

CAPL/3905/2024 · 2025-02-13

Manish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:9480 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3905 of 2024 Applicant :- Muneeb Prasad Opposite Party :- Veena Kumari Meena, Prin. Secy. / Addl. Chief Secy. Ayush Deptt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Lalendra Pratap Singh Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard. The present contempt petition has been preferred for non- compliance of the judgement and order dated 31.07.2024 passed in Writ-A No.5942 of 2024, the relevant extract is quoted hereinbelow: "6. In view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, the instant writ petition is being disposed of finally at the admission stage permitting the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.1 i.e. the Principal Secretary/ Additional Chief Secretary, Ayush Department, Government of U.P., Civil Secretariat, Lucknow taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him for disposal of the representation annexing therewith copy of his earlier representations, if any, and the relevant documents in support of his claim within a period of ten days from today, and if any such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, strictly in accordance with law by passing a speaking and reasoned order, with expedition, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order along with representation and the decision thereof be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. " Lalendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the respondent on the basis of instruction received from the respondent has submitted that the judgement and order of the writ court has been complied with. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant has very fairly submitted that the judgment and order passed by the writ court has been complied with and for all practical purposes, the present contempt petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous. As such, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous. Notice issued earlier, if any, stand discharged. Order Date :- 13.2.2025/S. Kumar Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench