Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 162455 (ALL)

SANTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO AND ANOTHER

/8794/2024 · 2025-01-13

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:2295 Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8794 of 2024 Applicant :- Santosh Kumar Shukla And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajeev Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record. 2. Learned counsel for the applicants, after arguing at length, prays to withdraw the instant application on account of some defect in the compromise with liberty to file the same afresh with proper pleadings and documents in support thereof. 3. The prayer sought has not been opposed by learned A.G.A. 4. In view of the above, the instant application is rejected as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. 5. The certified copy of the impugned order or any other certified document filed along with the application shall be returned to the learned Counsel for the applicants after retaining a photocopy of the same on record. Order Date :- 13.1.2025 Anand/- Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench