HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5302 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Dr. Amrendra Nath Tripathi, Advocate filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of respondents no.4 and 5, which is taken on record. 2. In the present case, taking cognizance of the proceedings of the trial court, I found that out of 22 dates fixed in the case, the case was adjourned on 18 dates due to call for boycott by the local bar association. Consequently, notices were issued to the respondents no. 4 and 5, namely, the President and the General Secretary of the Tehsil Bar Association, Alapur, District Ambedkar Nagar. 3. Today, Shri Sunit Kumar Dwivedi, President of the Tehsil Bar Association, Alapur, District Ambedkar Nagar and Shri Narendra Yadav, General Secretary of the Tehsil Bar Association, Alapur, District Ambedkar Nagar appeared in person before this Court. They have filed affidavit in writ petition bearing number Matter Under Article 227 No.5080 of 2025. 4. It has been stated that since the new committee has taken over since 02.09.2025, there has not been any call for boycott and also in the affidavit, they have stated that they assured this Court that they will make every possible effort to ensure smooth functioning of the court proceedings on every working day henceforth. 5. In light of the affidavit filed by the Office Bearer of the Bar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prakash Chandra Baranwal, Deepak Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Adityanath @ Aditya Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Tehsildar, Tehsil Alapur, Ambedkar Nagar And Others .....Respondent(s) Association, no further proceedings are required to be conducted subject to the fact that they shall adhere to the undertaking given before this Court and restrain themselves from giving a call for boycott. 6. Accordingly, in the aforesaid directions, notices issued to the respondents no.4 and 5 are discharged. Order on petition 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent no.1. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 / Tehsildar, Tehsil Alapur, District Ambedkar Nagar to decide the Case No.249 of 2024, (Computerized Case No.T202404040400249) "Aditya Nath vs. Kedar Nath" arising out of application for mutation under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 / Tehsildar, Tehsil Alapur, District Ambedkar Nagar considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 / Tehsildar, Tehsil Alapur, District Ambedkar Nagar is directed to decide Case No.249 of 2024, (Computerized Case No.T202404040400249) "Aditya Nath vs. Kedar Nath" arising out of application for mutation under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in A227 No. 5302 of 2025 2 expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 24, 2025 KR A227 No. 5302 of 2025 3 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench