Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 162450 (ALL)

AKSHAY SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/7364/2025 · 2025-09-03

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7364 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the record. 2. Instant application has been filed with prayer to quash the impugned cognizance/summoning order dated 12.03.2024 alongwith Bailable-Warrant dated 18.07.2025 and also prayed to quash the entire proceedings of Crl. Case No. 28589 of 2024 arising out of Case Crime No. 190 of 2023 u/s 435 and 120B IPC at P.S. Jankipuram District- Lucknow. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case with false and frivolous allegations. He further added that the applicant is not involved in committing the alleged offence as has been mentioned in the first information report. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51. 5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant. 6. On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dr. Pooja Singh, Abhishek Yadav, Achleshwar Raj Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Akshay Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) it is provided that in case, the applicant appears before the trial court within two weeks from today and files bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 7. Further, the applicant will have an opportunity at the appropriate stage to move an application for discharge through his counsel, taking therein all the legal and factual pleas which may be available to him, in accordance with law. In case, such an application is moved before the learned trial court, the learned trial court shall dispose of the same by a speaking and reasoned order strictly, in accordance with law. 8. The application is disposed off accordingly. September 3, 2025 Mayank A482 No. 7364 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench