Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16244 (CHH)

MOHIT KUMAR BALMIKI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1213/2025 · 2025-04-04

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:15831 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1213 of 2025 1 - Mohit Kumar Balmiki S/o Banshlal Balmiki Aged About 22 Years R/o Village Rahimpur, Karimpur, Kurtara, P.S. And Tahsil Bijnaur, District Kanpur Uttra Pradesh 2 - Maheshchandra Goutam S/o Shyamlal Aged About 47 Years R/o Village Rahimpur, Karimpur, Kurtara, P.S. And Tahsil Bijnaur, District Kanpur Uttra Pradesh 3 - Bhima Sena S/o Shri Hari Shisha Aged About 25 Years R/o Village Ambapoda, P.S. Machkund, Tahsil Jaipur, District Koraput Odisha (Detail Of The Applicants Have Not Mentioned In Annexure A-1) ... Applicant(s) versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House OfÏcer, Police Station Bodhghat Jagdalpur, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh ... Non-applicant(s) For Applicant(s) : None For Non-applicant(s) : Mr. Amit Verma, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 04.04.2025 1. This is an ofÏce reference. KUNAL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by KUNAL DEWANGAN 2 2. This Court, vide order dated 19.09.2024 passed in MCRC No. 5384/2024, while allowing the bail to the applicants, namely, Mohit Kumar Balmiki, Maheshchandra Goutam and Bhima Sena had expressed its trust that the trial Court would make an earnest endeavor to conclude the trial expeditiously in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order, if there was no legal impediment. 3. The learned Special Judge (NDPS Act), Bastar at Jagdalpur District- Bastar (C.G.) vide its request letter dated 20.03.2025 has requested for grant of some more time for concluding the trial. 4. It transpires from perusal of the PUD that in this case, charge-sheet was submitted on 02.09.2024. After framing of charges, the case is currently fixed for prosecution evidence. Hence, the trial is likely to take some time for its conclusion. 5. The request appears to be reasonable. The concerned trial Court is directed to conclude the trial as early as possible, preferably within a period of four months from today. 6. Accordingly, this CRMP stands disposed off with the aforesaid direction. 7. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Kunal