Bimlesh Kumar and Ors v. The State Of Bihar and Ors
CWJC/12690/2016 · 2025-07-22
Rajiv Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16243 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16243 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12690 of 2016 ======================================================
1. Bimlesh Kumar Son of Lala Singh
2. Amit Kumar Son of Lala Singh
3. Nawal Singh Son of Late Ashok Singh
4. Ram Kishore Singh Son of Late Ram Nandan Singh
5. Suresh Singh Son of Late Ram Nandan Singh
6. Ram Deyal Singh Son of Late Rambali Singh @ Balak Singh
7. Shiv Deyal Singh son of Late Rambali @ Balak Singh
8. Kamta Singh @ Kamta Prasad Singh son of Late Ashok
9. Rana pratap singh son of Late Ashok Singh All resident of village- Deh, Tola- Budha Chak, P.O.and P.S.- Fatwa, District-Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
2. The Collector cum District Magistrate, Patna
3. The Land Acquisition Officer, patna
4. The S.D.O. Patna-City, District-Patna
5. The C.O. Fatwa District-Patna
6. The patwari Steel Fatwa, through its Managing Director G. M. Patna- City, District-Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sunil Kr. Mandal- SC-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 22-07-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioners though State is present.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s):
“for a direction to the authority concerned to fix the proper and enhance rate of
Patna High Court CWJC No.12690 of 2016(2) dt.22-07-2025 2/2 the so acquired land of the petitioners as the petitioner are heirs and legal reprsentative of the Late Bishop Gope, son of Late Khaderan and the recorded tenant of khatiyan no. 932, Tauzi No. 3420, P.S. No. 23, Khewat No. 7, area-1 Acre and 7 decimal and 64 decimal. The application is further for a direction to the authority concerned to fix the rate of the so acquired land of the petitioner in a proper manner and in accordance with the law keeping in view that petitioners were based solely on the said acquired land as they have got no other land to cultivate except the acquired land and as such they are person.”
3. For want of prosecution, the writ petition stands dismissed.
vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U