ANUJ KUMAR @ ANUJ @ MONU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/7412/2025 · 2025-09-04
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162429 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162429 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7412 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. Instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C has been filed with the prayer to quash the chargesheet no. 306 of 2018, dated 24.08.2018 in Case No. 1225 of 2024; State Vs. Ambreesh and others, arising out of Case Crime No. 292 of 2018, under Sections 380, 411, 414 IPC, Police Station Maurawan, District Unnao; summoning order dated 12.09.2018 passed by learned ACJM-I, Unnao and NBW dated 03.08.2025 as well as entire proceedings in pursuance thereof. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and was never involved in committing the offence as has been mentioned in the First Information Report. He added that due to enmity, his name has been planted in the First Information Report and thereafter he has been chargesheeted. He next added that due to unavoidable circumstances, he could not appear before the court below. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ravindra Singh, Shiv Shankar Verma, Yogesh Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s): G.A. Anuj Kumar @ Anuj @ Monu .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
and another (2022)10 SCC 51. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant. On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties', it is provided that in case, the applicant appears before the trial court within two weeks from today and files bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). Further, the applicant will have an opportunity at the appropriate stage to move an application for discharge taking therein all the pleas factual and legal which may be available to him, in accordance with law.
In case, such an application is moved before the learned trial court, the learned trial court shall dispose of the same by a speaking and reasoned order strictly, in accordance with law. The application is disposed of accordingly. September 4, 2025 kkv/ A482 No. 7412 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench