ANIL KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/10231/2025 · 2025-09-04
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162421 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162421 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10231 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authority to decide petitioners' representation for posting in light of paragraph five of the Government order dated 06.05.2025 since petitioners have less than two years to superannuate.
3. Since consideration of petitioners' grievance would entail factual aspects, without entering into merits of the case, liberty is granted to petitioners to file a fresh individual representation before opposite party No. 2 i.e. Director General Jail Administration and Reform Services, Lucknow. In case such a representation is filed, the same shall be decided within a period of four weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.
4. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 4, 2025 Subodh/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : M.P. Raju Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Anil Kumar And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home U.P. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench