HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10258 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authority to decide petitioner's representation dated 20.08.2025 whereby she has raised her grievance with regard to continuous inquiry being made of her Income Certificate. 3. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition. 4. In view of aforesaid, petition is dismissed as not pressed. September 8, 2025 Satish Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Saryu Prasad Tiwari, Prince Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Smt Anju Lata .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Director Bal Vikas Seva Evam Pushtahaar Deptt. Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench