Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 162382 (ALL)

TEJVEER SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. AGRICULTURE LKO AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/10160/2025 · 2025-09-03

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10160 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-State No.1 as well as Shri Rajeev Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing for respondents No.2 & 3. 2. With the consent of the parties, the matter is being decided finally. 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that despite the petitioner having retired on attaining the age of superannuation on 30.06.2021, the respondents have only paid part of Employees Provident Fund while Gratuity and Leave Encashment has not been paid. 4. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondents to ensure payment of the admitted dues of the petitioner within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. 5. In case certain other dues are not found to be payable to the petitioner, the respondents shall assign the reason(s) for the same and inform it to the respondents. While making payment of the dues, the respondents shall also consider the admissible rate of interest on the delayed payment. September 3, 2025 prateek Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajendra Singh Kushwaha Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rajeeva Kumar Sinha (Abdul Moin,J.) Tejveer Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Agriculture Lko And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench