Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16238 (RAJ)

UMA KUMARI ALIAS URMILA KUMARI ORS v. STATE REVENUE DEPARTMENT ORS

CW/8524/2011 · 2025-05-02

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:18549] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8524/2011 1. Uma Kumari @ Urmila kumari d/o Late Shri Tej Raj Singh resident of Village Genta, Tehsil Pipalda, District Kota. 2. Hem Kanwar d/o Late Shri Tejraj Singh resident of Village Genta, Tehsil Pipalda, District Kota. 3. Mohan Kanwar @ Madhu Bala d/o Late shri Tej Raj Singh resident of Village Genta, Tehsil Pipalda, District Kota. 4. Kamla Kumari d/o Late shri Tej Raj Singh resident of Village Genta, Tehsil Pipalda, District Kota. 5. Ginraj Singh s/o Late shri Tej Raj Singh resident of Village Genta, Tehsil Pipalda, District Kota. 6. Vikram Singh s/o Late shri Tej Raj Singh resident of Village Genta, Tehsil Pipalda, District Kota. All through power of attorney holder Smt. Anjum Chaudhary aged '54' years wife of Shri M.S. Chaudhary, resident of 105-B, Ashirwad-Angan, Indra Vihar, Kota. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, Govt. of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. Tehsildar, Tehsil Ladpura, District Kota. 3. Nayab Tehsildar Mandana Tehsil Ladpura, District Kota. 4. Shri Satya Narain Singh Nayab Tehsildar, Mandana, Tehsil Ladpura, District Kota. 5. Collector District Kota ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Ms.Gunjan Chawla for Mr.Neeraj Batra, GC JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 02/05/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:18549] (2 of 2) [CW-8524/2011] 1. By way of filing this writ petition, a prayer has been made for issuing direction to the respondents for cancellation of the entries of mutation. 2. The matter pertains to correction of the entries in the Revenue Records, which cannot be entertained by this Court under its inherent jurisdiction contained under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India. 3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands dismissed. The petitioners may have liberty to approach appropriate forum of law for redressal of their grievance. 4. Since, the petitioners have remained unrepresented before this Court, they are not aware about passing of this order, Office is directed to send a copy of this order at the residential address of the petitioners, mentioned in the cause-title for their intimation/ information. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /40