Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16236 (KAR)

MANJUNATHA A. v. THE LAND TRIBUNAL

WP/34934/2016 · 2025-06-23

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21800 WP NO.34934 OF 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.34934 OF 2016 (LR) BETWEEN: 1. NAGENDRA S/O LATE AYODHYARAMA SHETTY AGE: 63 YEARS. (V/O DATED 23.06.2025, PETITIONER NO.1 IS DELETED) 2. MANJUNATHA A. S/O LATE AYODHYARAMA SHETTY AGE: 56 YEARS. 3. PATTABHI A. S/O LATE AYODHYARAMA SHETTY AGE: 50 YEARS. 4. SMT. LAXMIKANTHAMMA W/O LATE AYODHYARAMA SHETTY AGE: 84 YEARS. (V/O DATED 23.06.2025, PETITIONER NO.4 IS DELETED) ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF R/O NO.442, OLDL MADRAS ROAD K.R. PURAM BENGALURU - 560 046. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SATHISH K., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21800 WP NO.34934 OF 2016 AND: 1. THE LAND TRIBUNAL BENGALURU EAST TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 046. 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S. BUILDING BENGALURU - 560 001. 3. SMT. VENKATAMMA D/O LATE MUNISWAMY NAIDU AGE: 70 YEARS DEVASANDRA VILLAGE K.R. PURA HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK BENGALURU - 560 046. 4. SRI. D.K. MOHAN S/O LATE D.K. KRISSHNAPPA AGE: 52 YEARS. 5. D.K. DEVENDRAPPA S/O LATE D.K. KRISHNAPPA AGE: 47 YEARS. 6. D.K. VENUGOPAL S/O LATE D.K. KRISHNAPPA AGE: 45 YEARS. 7. SMT. JAYALAXMI D/O LAWTE D.K. KRISHNAPPA AGE: 43 YEARS. RESPONDENTS 4 TO 7 ARE RESIDENTS OF R/O NO.442, OLD MADRAS ROAD, K.R. PURAM, BENGALURU - 560 046. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21800 WP NO.34934 OF 2016 8. SMT. BHARATHI D/O LATE D.K. KRISHNAPPA AGE: 42 YEARS, R/AT SHAMANNA COMPOUND, DEVASANDRA, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BENGALURU - 560 036. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATH K., HCGP FOR R1 AND R2; SRI. MAHABALESHWAR G.L., ADVOCATE FOR R3; SRI. B.S. RADHANANDAN, ADVOCATE FOR R4; RESPONENTS 5, 6, 7 AND 8 - SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET-ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 09TH JANUARY, 2015 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1-LAND TRIBUNAL IN L.R.F. NO.33/1974-75 VIDE ANNEXURE-A; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for petitioners has filed memo dated 23rd June, 2025, seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the petition. The said memo reads as under: "MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL The petitioner Nos.2 and 3 submit that they are negotiating with respondent Nos.3 to 8 to settle the matter out of court and in view of the same, the petitioners Nos.2 and 3 do not wish to prosecute the above petition and seeks leave of this Hon'ble Court to - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21800 WP NO.34934 OF 2016 permit them to withdraw the above petition, in the interest of justice and equity." 2. It is noted that, petitioners 1 and 4 are deleted from the array of the parties in the petition at the risk of the learned counsel appearing for petitioners. 3. Accepting the memo dated 23rd June, 2025 filed by learned counsel appearing for petitioners, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3