Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 162338 (ALL)

M/S ADAMA INDIAN PVT.LTD.FORMERLY KNOWN AS MAKHTESHIM AGAIN INDIA PVT.LTD LKO v. STATE OF U.P. REP. BY ITS PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO AND 2 OTHERS

WTAX/933/2025 · 2025-09-16

Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT TAX No. - 933 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. This petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers :- "To issue an appropriate writ, or order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus and / or Certiorari declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing Form DRC 01 dated 15.11.2024 bearing Ref. No.ZD0911241757909 and consequently passing the summary of Order in Form GST DRC 07 dated 07.02.2025 vide Ref. No.ZD0902250893454 is being void, illegal, without jurisdiction, arbitrary, without authority of law apart from being in gross violation of principles of natural justice, Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same and pass such other order or orders as deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case." A preliminary objection has been raised by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State – respondents. He has pointed out the array of the parties. Writ petitioner is M/S Adama India Private Limited, through Assistant General Manager Shri Odela Praveen Kumar, however, affidavit filed in support of the writ petition is filed by Shri Venkat Ram Krishna Hari, resident of Andhra Pradesh and the affidavit states that the deponent is the petitioner and is pursuing the matter himself. The discrepancy in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition makes the writ petition not maintainable before this Court. Writ petition is dismissed with the liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh. Memo of appearance filed by Shri Atul Kumar Singh, Advocate on behalf of opposite party no.3 is taken on record. September 16, 2025 mks Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Izhar Ahmad, Jai Prakash Awasthi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., A.S.G.I. (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) M/S Adama Indian Pvt.Ltd.Formerly Known As Makhteshim Again India Pvt.Ltd Lko .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Rep. By Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MANISH SAXENA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench