UMA SHANKAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO AND 6 OTHERS
WPIL/928/2025 · 2025-09-04
Pankaj Bhatia
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162330 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162330 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 928 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the Standing Counsel.
2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer :
"Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party no.1 to 4 to remove the illegal possession over the Gata No.163/203/0.063 hect. registered as Naveen Parti/Harizan Abadi and Gata No.164/0.043 hect. registered as Naveen Parti in revenue record situated at Village-Upadhyaypur, Pargana & Tehsil-Patti, District- Pratapgarh as contained in Annexure No.1 to this writ petition."
3. Learned Standing Counsel, on the basis of the instructions, states that the proceedings under section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code haved already been initiated.
4. In view of the said statement, it is directed that the pending proceedings shall be concluded with all expedition preferably within a period of ninety days in accordance with law.
5. The writ petition stands disposed off with the said observations. September 4, 2025 VNP/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Uma Shankar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench