HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 933 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Shri Krishna Kumar Pandey, Advocate has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of the opposite party no. 6. The same is taken on record. 2. Heard Shri Anuj Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and Shri Krishna Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 6. 3. The petitioner alleges encroachment of pond land. He relies upon Khasra of 1332 fasli and has not annexed latest Khatuani or Khasra. In fact, in para 9 of the writ petition he has stated that one Shanti Tripathi W/o Chandra Bhushan Tripathi has got recorded her name in respect of the said 'talab' in connivance with the tehsil officials and has executed a post sale deed in favour of Siya Dulari in respect of part thereof and Siya Dulari in turn has sold off the said land to opposite party no. 7. 4. This is not a matter for interference in public interest litigation. The petitioner may approach the authorities or Court concerned if he has locus standi and a cause. Our order shall not be understood as validating any illegal action. We have simply not entertained a PIL in the matter. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anuj Pratap Singh, Dhiraj Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Namit Sharma Guru Prasad Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) 5. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. September 8, 2025 R.K.P. WPIL No. 933 of 2025 2 (Manjive Shukla,J.)(Rajan Roy,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench