Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 162314 (ALL)

SAJRUN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

NABAIL/1167/2025 · 2025-09-09

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1167 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Sukh Deo Singh, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Shikhar Srivastava, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed by the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in F.I.R. bearing Case Crime No. 204/2025, under Sections 109, 115(2), 352 B.N.S., Police Station Gauriganj, District Amethi. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 15.06.2025 against the applicant and her husband Arshad stating that both the accused persons started quarreling with the complainant at about 09:00 p.m. on 14.05.2025 and the applicant's husband co-accused Arshad fired a gun shot due to which the informant suffered an injury in his hand. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent woman having no criminal history and she has been falsely implicated in the present case. 5. The learned A.G.A. has opposed the anticipatory bail application and he has submitted that the investigation is still going on. Learned AGA has produced a copy of relevant extract of case diary for perusal of the Court which contains a statement of the informant wherein he has merely stated that at the time of the incident, the applicant was accompanying her husband and no other allegation has been levelled against the applicant. 6. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be granted anticipatory bail. 7. In view of the above, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant is allowed. In the event of arrest/ appearance of applicant-Sajrun before the learned Trial Court in the aforesaid case crime, she shall be released on anticipatory bail on her furnishing Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sukh Deo Singh, Paritosh Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sajrun .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) personal bond and two solvent sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of S.H.O./Court concerned on the following conditions and subject to any other conditions that may be fixed by the Trial Court: (i). that the applicant shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; (iii) that the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court. (iv) that the applicant shall appear before the trial court on each date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted; and (v). that the applicant shall not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. September 9, 2025 Pradeep/- NABAIL No. 1167 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench