Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16231 (KAR)

B. KRISHNAPPA v. KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LTD

WP/47201/2015 · 2025-03-06

R Nataraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:9633 WP No. 47201 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 47201 OF 2015 (S-PRO) BETWEEN: B. KRISHNAPPA, S/O B GOVINDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, WORKING AS ASSISTANT, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELECTRICAL), C-4 SUB-DIVISION, BESCOM, TATA NAGAR, BANGALORE. AND RESIDING AT FLAT NO. 204, K P HEIGHTS APARTMENTS, 2ND CROSS, SHANTIVANA, SAHAKARA NAGARA, BANGALORE - 92. …PETITIONER (BY SRI SUBRAMANYA BHAT M., ADVOCATE [PH]) AND: 1. KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LTD. (K.P.T.C.L.), CAUVERY BHAVAN, K.G.ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 009. REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2. THE DIRECTOR, (ADMN. AND HRD), FORMERLY DESIGNATED AS GENERAL MANAGER (ADMN AND HR), KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LTD. (ADM. AND HRD), Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:9633 WP No. 47201 of 2015 CAUVERY BHAVAN, K.G.ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 009. 3. SRI E NATARAJ, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELE), MAJOR WORKS DIVISION, KPTCL, J C S EXTENSION, CHITRADURGA-577 501. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SHUBHA.S, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.1 AND 2 NOTICE TO RESPONDENT NO.3 IS SERVED) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS PERTAINING TO THE PETITIONER. a) QUASH PARAGRAPH 2 OF THE BOARD ORDER BEARING NO. KPTCL/B16/B58/3414/04-05, BANGALORE DATED 22.11.2007 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 (STATED AS RESPONDENT NO.3 IN THE PRAYER PORTION OF THE PETITION) (ANNEXURE- H) AS THE SAME IS ARBITRARY, ILLEGAL, UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND CONTRARY TO THE PROVISIONS OF R & P REGULATIONS ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER The petitioner has challenged an order bearing No.KPTCL/B16/B58/3414/04-05, dated 22.11.2007 by which, the respondent No.2 granted approval for the change of cadre of Assistant Executive Engineers (Non-Graduates) as Assistant - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:9633 WP No. 47201 of 2015 Executive Engineers (Graduates) on acquisition of B.E/A.M.I.E qualification subject to the conditions stated therein. 2. When this petition was listed for preliminary hearing in ‘B’ group, this Court queried the learned counsel for the petitioner, whether the petitioner is still in service. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that the petitioner has attained the age of superannuation and has retired from service. He was further asked whether granting any reliefs in this writ petition would result in any financial benefit to the petitioner. Learned counsel fairly submitted that this would not result in any financial benefit to the petitioner. 3. In that view of the matter, this Writ Petition has become infructuous. Consequently, the same is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE SMA / List No.: 1 Sl No.: 52