HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8422 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Anand Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, Smt. Kamlesh Kumari, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.202 of 2025, under Sections 137(2), 87 BNS and Section 16/17 of POCSO Act, registered at Police Station Sakran, District Sitapur. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 07.07.2025 stating that the applicant had enticed away the informant's daughter aged about 15 years on 05.07.2025. The girl had returned home in the evening of 05.07.2025 itself. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is an innocent young man aged 20 years, he has been falsely implicated in the present case. 5. A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the applicant disclosing his involvement in another criminal case in which he has not been summoned till date. 6. Copies of the statements of victim recorded by the Investigating Officer have been annexed with the supplementary affidavit, wherein she stated that she had gone away from her home alone. On her way, the applicant met her and he took her to his sister's house where the applicant's parents and brother were present and they abused her and took her to the police station and thereafter, the police has given the information about it to her parents and Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anand Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ram Murti .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others .....Opposite Party(s) her parents and the Village Pradhan brought her back. She categorically stated that the applicant did not commit any misdeed against her. The victim declined to undergo medico-legal examination. 7. In the statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS, the victim reiterated her earlier version. 8. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail application but she could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 9. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the consistent statements of the victim, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime. 10. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 11. Let the applicant - Ram Murti be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. September 9, 2025 S. Shivhare BAIL No. 8422 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench