SHAILENDRA SINGH @ BABLOO v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
/7706/2025 · 2025-09-12
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162292 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162292 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7706 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant application has been filed with prayer to quash the Chargesheet No. 01 of 2024 dated 17/06/2024 arising out of F.I.R. No 0046 of 2024, related with Police Station Chanda District Sultanpur, as well as summoning order dated 19/07/2024 passed in Criminal case No. 5073 of 2024 under sections 386, 211, 182, 195, 120-8 IPC Police Station- Chanda, District-Sultanpur. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that there is no evidence at all against the applicant and only on the basis of statement recorded by the police under Section 161 of Cr.P.C., the whole proceeding has been initiated and chargesheet has been filed. He added that the criminal proceedings against the present applicant is nothing but harassment. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the State has opposed the contention aforesaid and submits that there is no abuse of process of law and only factual matrix has been agitated before this Court and that could not be gone into at this stage, invoking the jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and thus the application is liable to be dismissed. 5. After the argument at length, learned counsel for the applicant submits that interest of justice would be sub-served, if this Court directs the court below to permit the applicants to appear before the court below and file an Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Akhand Pratap Pandey, Rohit Upadhyay Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Shailendra Singh @ Babloo .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
application of discharge. He further submits that the court below may be directed to decide the discharge application within stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this Court. 6. Learned AGA for the State has no objection to the aforesaid submission. 7. In view of aforesaid, the applicant is permitted to file an application for discharge before the court below within a period of two weeks from today and if such an application is filed, the same shall be decided within a further period of 60 days, strictly in accordance with law. 8.
With the aforesaid observation, the application is disposed of. September 12, 2025 Mayank A482 No. 7706 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench