Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16228 (GAU)

DHIRENDRA NATH v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

AB/1710/2025 · 2025-09-15

Mridul Kumar Kalita

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010159302025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1710/2025 DHIRENDRA NATH S/O LATE BIBEKANANDA NATH R/O JORAIDOTOLA, P.S. BORKHALA, DIST. CACHAR, ASSAM, VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR B P BORAH, MR. P DEKA,MR P J DUTTA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER Date : 16.09.2025 1. Heard Mr. P. J. Dutta, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. M. Das, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner by order dated 24.07.2025, was allowed to go on interim anticipatory bail by this Court and in pursuant to the directions of this Court, he Page No.# 2/2 has appeared before the Investigating Officer. 3. On the other hand, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor has produced the case diary of CID P.S. Case No. 07/2025. 4. He further submits that the petitioner has appeared before the Investigating Officer and his statement under Section 181 of BNS, 2023 has also been recorded. 5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has objected to making the interim bail absolute on the ground that there are sufficient incriminating materials against the petitioner. 6. I have considered the submissions made by both the sides and have gone through the materials available on record including the case diary of CID P.S Case No. 07/2025. 7. It appears that the petitioners has complied with the directions of this Court and as he has co-operated in the investigation, as such, the interim bail granted to him by order dated 24.07.2025 is hereby made absolute with the condition Nos. 1 and 2 attached to the said order remaining intact. 8. With the above observations, this anticipatory bail application is disposed of. 9. Send back the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant