HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5310 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents no.1 to 3. 2. In light of the proposed order, notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to the respondent no.1, Board of Revenue, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow to decide the stay application along with revision No.2189 of 2024, "Haushila Prasad Tiwari and another vs. District Magistrate, Basti and others", expeditiously. 4. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioners confines his prayer for a suitable direction to consider and decide the aforesaid stay application. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Accordingly, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, without entering into the merits, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.1, the Board of Revenue, Lucknow to consider and decide the stay application filed along with Revision No.2189 of 2024, "Haushila Prasad Tiwari and another vs. District Magistrate, Basti and others, within a period of six weeks from the date sufficiency of service is received with Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nripendra Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta Houshila Prasad Tiwari And Another .....Petitioner(s) The Board Of Revenue Kaisarbag, Lko. Thru. Chairman And Others .....Respondent(s) regard to the respondents, and in case there is some legal impediment, it shall also be open for the petitioners to press for grant of ad interim relief in case the case is so made. September 8, 2025 KR A227 No. 5310 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench