REETA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE, LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
A227/5361/2025 · 2025-09-09
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162271 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162271 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5361 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Case called out.
2. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition.
3. It is noticed that orders for expediting has already been passed in favour of petitioner on two occasions vide order dated 03.11.2022 passed in Matters Under Article 227 No. 4210 of 2023 and and order dated 10.01.2024 passed in Matters Under Article 227 No. 72 of 2024, accordingly a freshg writ petition would not be maintainable.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. September 9, 2025 Ravi/ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sarjoo Ram, Aklavya, Mamta Rawat, Mohan Lal Maurya, Prashant Shekhar, Rachna Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Alok Mathur,J.) Reeta .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench