Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 162265 (ALL)

SHASHI KUMAR PANDEY AND 4 OTHERS v. CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION) COURT NO-38 SULTANPUR AND ANOTHER

/5281/2025 · 2025-09-12

Jaspreet Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5281 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vijay Dixit learned counsel who appears for High Court. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of Case no.204 of 1985 pending before the Civil Judge, Court no.38 Sultanpur since 1985. In deference to the order passed by this Court dated 04.09.2025 a copy of the written instructions has been provided under signatures of the Presiding Officer of the Court of Additional Civil Judge (J.D) Court-34, Sultanpur. From a perusal of the aforesaid instructions it has been indicated that the said Presiding Officer has joined recently and noticing that the case of the year 1985 top priority shall be accorded. Considering the aforesaid, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending rather ends of justice can be met by directing the court concerned to take note of the fact that the instant matter relates to the year 1985. The trial court is further directed to fix short dates, atleast twice every week, and if possible on day to day basis without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties and in case of misuse, the trial court will be well within its right to pass appropriate orders including fixing of costs taking note of the decision of the Apex Court in case of Vinod Seth vs Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rahul Roshan Dubey, Ghanshyam Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : Gaurav Mehrotra Shashi Kumar Pandey And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) Civil Judge (Junior Division) Court No-38 Sultanpur And Another .....Respondent(s) Devinder Bajaj; (2010) 8 SCC 1. An endeavor would be made to decide the matter preferably within next two months and compliance report shall be sent to the Court. With the aforesaid the petition is disposed of. September 12, 2025 Harshita A227 No. 5281 of 2025 2 (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench