SUMIT (CONSTABLE , PNO-212660333) v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/10128/2025 · 2025-09-03
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162251 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162251 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10128 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to opposite parties to consider petitioner's case for transfer from U.P. 112, District Sitapur to U.P. 112 District Meerut on the basis of spousal transfer since petitioner's wife is working in the same department in District Meerut.
3. For the said grievance, petitioner has already submitted a representation dated 30.05.2025, but seeks liberty to file a fresh representation before the authority concerned.
4. Considering the innocuous prayer being made by learned counsel for petitioner and without entering into merits of the case, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before opposite party no.3 i.e. Deputy Inspector General of Police (Karmik), D.G.P. Headquarter, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, who shall consider and decide the same, in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date such representation is made along with a certified copy of this order.
5. With aforesaid observations and directions, the petition is finally disposed of. September 3, 2025 Satish Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjay Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Sumit (Constable , Pno-212660333) .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench