Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 162247 (ALL)

VANDANA VERMA v. COMMISSIONER, FAIZABAD DIVISION, FAIZABAD NOW AYODHYA AND OTHERS

A227/5327/2025 · 2025-09-08

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5327 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent no.1. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondents no.2 to 4 is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 / Commissioner, Faizabad Division, Faizabad now Ayodhya to decide the Revision No. 708 of 2016, filed under Section 219 of Land Revenue Act, (Aditya Verma versus Arjeet @ Chetan Verma and others), which is pending since 23.06.2016, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 / Commissioner, Faizabad Division, Faizabad now Ayodhya, considers and decides the aforesaid restoration application in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 / Commissioner, Faizabad Division, Faizabad now Ayodhya is directed to decide the Revision No. 708 of 2016, filed under Section 219 of Land Revenue Act, (Aditya Verma versus Arjeet @ Chetan Verma and others), expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Sahu Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Vandana Verma .....Petitioner(s) Commissioner, Faizabad Division, Faizabad Now Ayodhya And Others .....Respondent(s) order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 8, 2025 KR A227 No. 5327 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench