Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16224 (PNJ)

INDER MOHAN RAI AND ORS v. NIRMAL SHARMA AND ORS

CR/7097/2017 · 2025-04-02

Alka Sarin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 245 CR-7097-2017 (O&M) Date of Decision : 02.04.2025 INDER MOHAN RAI AND ORS .... Petitioners VERSUS NIRMAL SHARMA AND ORS .... Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present : Ms. Niharika Mittal, Advocate for Mr. Vibhav Jain, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Armaan Dahiya, Advocate for Mr. A.S. Chadha, Advocate for the respondents. ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL) CM-2928-CII-2023 1. This is an application for condonation of delay of 47 days in filing the application being CM-1731-CII-2023 for restoration of the main revision petition which was dismissed for non-prosecution vide order dated 14.11.2022 passed by this Court. 2. Notice of the application. 3. Mr. Armaan Dahiya, Advocate for Mr. A.S. Chadha, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondents and states that he has no objection if the present application is allowed. 4. In view thereof, the present application is allowed and the delay of 47 days in filing the application being CM-1731-CII-2023 for restoration of the main revision petition is condoned. AMAN JAIN 2025.04.03 09:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment 245 CR-7097-2017 (O&M) -2- CM-1731-CII-2023 5. This is an application for restoration of the main revision petition which was dismissed for non-prosecution vide order dated 14.11.2022 passed by this Court. 6. Notice of the application. 7. Mr. Armaan Dahiya, Advocate for Mr. A.S. Chadha, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondents and states that he has no objection if the present application is allowed. 8. In view thereof, the present application is allowed, and the main revision petition is restored to its original number and status. With the consent of the counsels the main case is taken on Board today itself. CR-7097-2017 9. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners’ states that the present revision petition has since been rendered infructuous inasmuch as the main suit itself stands partly decreed by the Trial Court. 10. Dismissed as having become infructuous. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off. 02.04.2025 (ALKA SARIN) Aman Jain JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: Yes/No AMAN JAIN 2025.04.03 09:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment