HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8621 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State-respondent(s) and perused the material available on record. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner, who is the complainant, against an order dated 29.03.2025 passed by the opposite party no.1/Joint Food Commissioner, Prayagraj Mandal, Prayagraj, whereby, the matter was remanded for consideration afresh. 3. The petitioner could not demonstrate any right much less the statutory of vested right having been violated on account of the said order, no interference is called for. 4. Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. September 9, 2025 Praveen Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Ojha Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Ajeet Kumar Sharma .....Petitioner(s) Joint Food Commissioner Prayagraj Mandal And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench