SMT. GAYATRI v. TEHSILDAR, TEHSIL BIKAPUR, AYODHYA AND OTHERS
A227/5265/2025 · 2025-09-03
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162227 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162227 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5265 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondents is hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for a direction to the respondent No.1 -Tehsildar, Tehsil Bikapur, District Ayodhya to decide mutation application No.2948/2024 (computerized case No.T- 202404230302948 (Gayatri Vs. Shobawati) filed by the petitioner under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner, to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 - Tehsildar, Tehsil Bikapur, District Ayodhya is directed to decide mutation application No.2948/2024 (computerized case No.T- 202404230302948 (Gayatri Vs. Shobawati) filed by the petitioner under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 expeditiously, say within a period of four months, if possible, from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, if there is no legal impediment.
6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Saryu Prasad Tiwari, Prince Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt. Gayatri .....Petitioner(s) Tehsildar, Tehsil Bikapur, Ayodhya And Others .....Respondent(s)
September 3, 2025 RKM. A227 No. 5265 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench