Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16222 (AP)

Sri. Badaganapalle Murali Mohan, v. STATE OF AP

CRLP/4160/2019 · 2025-09-03

K Suresh Reddy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010212762019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: Between: 1. SRI. BADAGANAPALLE MURALI MOHAN,, S/O. PRABHAKAR REDDY, AGED 41 YEARS, OCC ADVOCATE, TIRUPATI, CHITOOR DISTRICT. 1. STATE OF AP, Through Public Prosecutor, High Court at Amaravathi, Amaravathi Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court to quash CC. No. 1412/2019, on the file of II Addl Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nellore, on the following amongst the other. IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased be pleased to dispense with the filing of certified of C.C. No. 1412 of 2019 with Xerox copy IA NO: 2 OF 2019 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4160/2019 SRI. BADAGANAPALLE MURALI MOHAN,, S/O. PRABHAKAR REDDY, AGED 41 YEARS, OCC ADVOCATE, TIRUPATI, CHITOOR ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND STATE OF AP, Through Public Prosecutor, High Court at Amaravathi, ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court to quash CC. No. 1412/2019, on the file of II ial Magistrate of First Class, Nellore, on the following amongst the Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the be pleased be pleased to dispense with the filing of certified of C.C. No. 1412 of 2019 with Xerox copy Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3239] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY SRI. BADAGANAPALLE MURALI MOHAN,, S/O. PRABHAKAR REDDY, AGED 41 YEARS, OCC ADVOCATE, TIRUPATI, CHITOOR ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED STATE OF AP, Through Public Prosecutor, High Court at Amaravathi, ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court to quash CC. No. 1412/2019, on the file of II ial Magistrate of First Class, Nellore, on the following amongst the Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the be pleased be pleased to dispense with the filing of certified Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the Petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings in CC. No. 1412/2019, on the file of II Addl Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nellore, including the appearance of the petitioner Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. V VENKATA MAYUR Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following ORDER: Sri V.Venkata Mayur, learned counsel for the petitioner, appearing through virtual hearing, represented by his colleague Sri K.Veera Reddy, learned counsel, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Criminal Petition stating that a statutory appeal was provided under Section 341 Cr.P.C. Instead of filing statutory appeal under Section 341 Cr.P.C., he filed present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. As such, he intends to file an appeal under Section 341 Cr.P.C. Permission is granted. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioner is at liberty to avail appropriate remedies available to him under law. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. __________________ K SURESH REDDY, J Date: 04.09.2025 MVA