SOHEL AHMAD v. CONSOLIDATION OFFICER FINAL RECORD FIRST, SADAR, SULTANPUR AND 4 OTHERS
A227/5315/2025 · 2025-09-08
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162210 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162210 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5315 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent no.1.
2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondents no.3 to 5 is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 / Consolidation Officer, Final Record First Sadar District Sultanpur to decide the Case No.538 of 2025 (Computerized Case No.202554046850060204) "Sohel Ahmad vs. Mohd. Hakeem and others" under Section 9A(2) of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 / Consolidation Officer, Final Record First Sadar District Sultanpur, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 / Consolidation Officer, Final Record First Sadar District Sultanpur is directed to decide the Case No.538 of 2025 (Computerized Case No.202554046850060204) "Sohel Ahmad vs. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Asheesh Kumar Tiwari, Ramakant Dhar Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Sohel Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) Consolidation Officer Final Record First, Sadar, Sultanpur And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
Mohd. Hakeem and others" under Section 9A(2) of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953, expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 8, 2025 KR A227 No. 5315 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench