Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 162197 (ALL)

SHARAVAN KUMAR JAISWAL v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS ADDL. CHIEF/ PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/8603/2025 · 2025-09-03

Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8603 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State Respondents. 2. This petition has been filed with the following main prayer:- "(i) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus Commanding to the respondent to issue the character certificate in favour of the petitioner within a reasonable time as early as possible in the interest of justice." 3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the prayer of the petitioner for issuance of Character Certificate is not being considered on the ground that there is an F.I.R. in Case Crime/FIR No.244 of 2021 under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 395, 397 of the I.P.C. and Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act, lodged at Police Station Atrauli, District Hardoi. 4. It has been submitted that lodging of F.I.R. cannot make the petitioner automatically guilty of any offence. 5. This Court in Writ-C No.718 of 2025: Anil Kumar Vs. State of U.P. and others, and connected matters reported in 2025:AHC-LKO:32272-DB, has observed that where there is a criminal case that is pending against a person, the Character Certificate issued by the Superintendent of Police should mention the details of such criminal case in the Character Certificate and Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Uttam Kumar Awasthi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Sharavan Kumar Jaiswal .....Petitioner(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief/ Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) leave it for the employer/agency to which the petitioner has applied to take an appropriate decision after application of mind regarding the suitability of the candidate/ applicant. 6. We have gone through the judgement which has been rendered in a bunch of writ petitions on 28.05.2025 by this Court. We are in agreement with the same. 7. We, therefore, dispose of this petition with a direction to the Commissioner of Police, District Lucknow, to ensure that a verification report is sent to the District Magistrate, Lucknow, respondent no.2, containing the details of the F.I.R. lodged against the petitioner. The District Magistrate while issuing Character Certificate shall mention the pendency of F.I.R. and the final report, if any, filed in the trial court, which is pending disposal before the trial court. Such certificate be issued within a period of four weeks from the date a copy of this order is produced before him. September 3, 2025 Sachin WRIC No. 8603 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench