PUTTILAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS
A227/5239/2025 · 2025-09-02
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162181 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162181 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5239 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard Sri Rohit Jaiswal, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 2.
2. After arguing the matter up to some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press the writ petition.
3. Accordingly, in view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. September 2, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rohit Jaiswal, Brij Mohan Singh, Mohit Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Puttilal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench