A.Kamrudheen v. The Deputy Superintendent of Police
WP Crl.(MD)/1276/2025 · 2025-09-09
Sunder Mohan
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162180 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162180 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.Crl.(MD)No.1276 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.09.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN W.P.Crl.(MD).No.1276 of 2025 A.Kamrudheen ... Petitioner
Vs. 1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thuraiyur Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Thuraiyur Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District. 3.M.A.Abdullah 4.Mohammed Kasim 5.Mohammed Hanifa 6.A.Sahul Hameed
...Respondents Prayer
: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 2 to grant an adequate continuous police protection to the petitioner for the peaceful administration and management of the Khazi Yeomiah Wakf and its institutions by preventing unlawful interference by respondents 3 to 6 within a time frame fixed by this Court. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.Crl.(MD)No.1276 of 2025
For Petitioner : Mr.S.I.Muthiah For R-1 & R-2 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi
Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER
The petitioner has sought for a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner for the peaceful administration and management of the Khazi Yeomiah Wakf and its institutions by preventing unlawful interference by the respondents 3 to 6.
2. According to the petitioner, he had obtained a decree in his favour and the issue has attained finality as the appeal challenging the said decree was also dismissed. Admittedly, there are disputes between the petitioner and the respondents 3 to 6 as regards the management of the Wakf in question. Hence, this Court is of the view that the respondent Police cannot interfere in such disputes and determine as to who is entitled to manage the Wakf. Consequently, there cannot be any direction to the respondent Police to provide police protection. It is for the petitioner to take steps to execute the decree in the manner known to law. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.Crl.(MD)No.1276 of 2025
3. With the above observations, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. 09.09.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No Lm
To 1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thuraiyur Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Thuraiyur Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.Crl.(MD)No.1276 of 2025 SUNDER MOHAN, J. Lm W.P.Crl.(MD).No.1276 of 2025 09.09.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis