SHIV KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. OF THE RURAL DEVE. LKO AND 6 OTHERS
WPIL/937/2025 · 2025-09-08
Manjive Shukla, Rajan Roy
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162180 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162180 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 937 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J.
HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
1. Heard.
2. The petitioner has made allegations against the Gram Pradhan. If there is a cause the petitioner can file a complaint under Rule 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Removal of Pradhans, Up-Pradhans and Members) Enquiry Rules, 1997, as per law.
3. We see no reason to entertain a Public Interest Litigation when there is a remedy prescribed for the same under law.
4. The petition is, accordingly, disposed of. September 8, 2025 Arnima Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Shiv Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Of The Rural Deve. Lko And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARNIMA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ARNIMA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench