Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 162180 (ALL)

SHIV KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. OF THE RURAL DEVE. LKO AND 6 OTHERS

WPIL/937/2025 · 2025-09-08

Manjive Shukla, Rajan Roy

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 937 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner has made allegations against the Gram Pradhan. If there is a cause the petitioner can file a complaint under Rule 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Removal of Pradhans, Up-Pradhans and Members) Enquiry Rules, 1997, as per law. 3. We see no reason to entertain a Public Interest Litigation when there is a remedy prescribed for the same under law. 4. The petition is, accordingly, disposed of. September 8, 2025 Arnima Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Shiv Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Of The Rural Deve. Lko And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARNIMA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ARNIMA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench