BODHIREDDY SRINIVAS REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/13067/2025 · 2025-06-17
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16218 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16218 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAV^Xa^^ (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JU TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 13067 OF 2025 Between: Bodhireddy'^rinivas Reddy, S/o. Late Sri B. Appala Reddy, Aged 42 years, Occ Private Service, R/o Door No. 52-13-25/1, Old Resapuvanipale m, Visakhapatnam -13. ...PETITIONER ^ AND
1. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Horne Department Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi Guntur District. 2. The Director General of Police, DGP Office, Mangalagiri Guntur District. U-
3. The Commissioner of Police, Commissioner Office Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. Andhra Pradesh. ^
4. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Dwaraka Sub-Division Visakhapatnam City. 5. The Station House Officer, Dwaraka Police Station Visakhapatnam City.'"
6. Sarip^ Govind Rajula Venkata Apparao, Son of late Appala Swamy, Aged About 59 years. Door No.50-81-65, Near Durga Ganapathi Temple Seethammapeta, Main Road, Visakhapatnam-530016. ^ IfS^ ...RESPONDEN Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ Order
7 r" ■h ! 7 f / / or orders. Direction or Direction to declaring inaction of the 5th Respondent to register Crime/FIR against the Respondent No.6 on petitioners Complaint dated 19-03-2025 is highly illegal, arbitrary, violation of Art 14,19 (g) and 21 of Constitution of India and also violation of principle of Natural Justice and against the Judgment and Guidelines passed in the case of Lalitha Kumari Vs. Government of UP and others, and consequently direct the 5th Respondent to register the Crime/FIR against the Respondent No. 6 on petitioners Complaint dated 19-03-2025. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 5th Respondent to register the Crime/FIR against the Respondent No. 6, on petitioners Complaint dated 19-03- 2025 pending disposal of the Writ petition.
Counsel for the PetitionerSRI VENKATESWARLU GADA ^ Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 5: GP FOR HOME v- Counsel for the Respondent No.6: — The Court made the following: ORDER
1 m*' W.P. No.13067 of 2025 APHC010212002025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 13067/2025 Between: Bodhireddy Srinivas Reddy ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.VENKATESWARLU GADA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:
2 lic». W.P. No.13067 of 2025 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.13067 OF 2025
ORDER:
1. Heard the submissions of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the Home Department.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is aggrieved by the purported actions of the Corporator, who has allegedly encroached Rajendranagar Park land, admeasuring 2000 square yards. In this regard, the petitioner has lodged a complaint before the police: However, the police authorities have failed to register the same. Aggrieved by such inaction, the petitioner has preferred the present writ petition.
3. The petitioner is advised to avail the appropriate remedy by approaching the competent Municipal authorities with a representation in accordance with law.
4. In view of the aforesaid circumstances, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present petition at this stage. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to take recourse available remedy in accordance with law.
5. With the above, the writ petition is closed. No costs.
6. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in thi%<Wf;(t petition shall stand closed.
Sd/- M. PRABHAKAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR \ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. OneCCto SRI. VENKATESWARLU GADA, Advocate [OPUC]
2. Two CCs to GP FOR HOl'i/lC" High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT
3. Three C.D.Copies nm
•p HIGH COURT DATED: 18/06/2025
ORDER WP.No.13067 of 2025 gp ANO/g> if 0 5 AUG 2025 CO t2V SvCurrentSectigpx'^I^ CLOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS