APHC010213752002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 23562/2002 Between: 1. M.VENKATESWARA RAJU PRAKASAM, S/O LATE M.V.RAJU HEAD MASTER S.R.R.HIGH SCHOOL, CUMBUM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. S E DEPT HYD 6 ORS, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD 2. COMMISSIONER DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDN, HYDERABAD 3. REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDN, GUNTUR 4. DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE 5. DEPUTY EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, PRAKSAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE 6. CORRESPONDENT, SRI RANGA RAJU HIGH SCHOOL, PRAKASAM DIS 7. P NAGESWARA RAO B ED ASST, RANGA RAJU HIGH SCHOOL, PRAKASAM DIST. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toTo issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings Rc.No.1355/B2/3/SF/2002 dated 2-11-2002 issued by the 2nd respondent as 2 arbitrary, discriminatory and contrary to the orders issued by the 1st respondent in the Govt. memo no.25969 dated 6-2-2002 and consequently set aside the same and also declare that the appointment of the 7th respondent as Headmaster of SRR School is void and therefore unsustainable and with all other consequential benefits, monetary and otherwise IA NO: 1 OF 2002(WPMP 29569 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To grant interim suspension of the proceedings Rc.no.1355/B2-3/SF/2001 dated 2-11-2002 issued by the 2nd respondent. IA NO: 1 OF 2003(WVMP 156 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 2 OF 2003(WPMP 15532 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to clarify the order dated 2-5-2003 in WPMP.No. 29569 of 2002 in WP.No,. 23562 of 2002 directing the DEO to maintain status quo existing as on 2-11- 2002 ie. prior to the issuance of the proceedings in Rc.No. 1355/B2-3/Sf/2002 dated 2-11-2002 issued by the Commissioner, Director of School Education (R2) in all respects. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V JAGAPATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. KASA JAGANMOHAN REDDY 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: On 07.07.2025, there was no representation for the petitioners and the writ petition being old, the matter was posted finally. 2. Today, Sri T.Deva Deepak, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 31st July, 2025 RKS