HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5252 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Ajay Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya, to decide interim relief application pending in Appeal No. 1222 of 2025 (Computerized Case No. C-202504000001222) - Ramesh Kumar Mishra and Others Vs. Mohd. Husain and Others, U/S 331(3) of the U.P. Z.A. & L.R. Act, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 1 - Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya, is directed to decide interim relief application pending in Appeal No. 1222 of 2025 (Computerized Case No. C-202504000001222) - Ramesh Kumar Mishra and Others Vs. Mohd. Husain and Others, U/S 331(3) of the U.P. Z.A. & L.R. Act, expeditiously, say within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of service report regarding service of notice upon opposite parties therein, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the application and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 2, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Alok Mathur,J.) Ramesh Kumar Mishra And Another .....Petitioner(s) Addl. Commissioner Judicial, Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench