Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 162155 (ALL)

SONU DUBE v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. (REVENUE) GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. AND 10 OTHERS

WRIC/8624/2025 · 2025-09-09

Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8624 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel, who appears for the State-opposite parties and perused the record. 2. This writ petition has been filed by petitioner with following main prayer: "I. To issue writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing/commanding Opposite Party No.2 to decide the representation/application dated 31/07/2025 as contained in the Annexure No.11 to the writ petition." 3. We have gone through the representation moved by the petitioner, a copy of which has been filed as Annexure No.11 to the writ petition and also the instructions sent by the Tehsildar, Sadar, Balrampur, which has been produced before this Court by learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel. The instructions are taken on record. 4. From the instructions, it is evident that after the petitioner bought land of Gata No.851 in the name of his mother, mutation was carried out and demarcation was also done on 11.04.2025 and Gata No.851 was demarcated through boundary pillars. No encroachment has been found on Gata No.851. Next to Gata No.851 is 'abaadi' land of Gata No.845. The petitioner wants a passage through Gata No.845, which is not recorded as 'rasta' in village 'abaadi'. and which is in possession of private Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Daya Shankar Tiwari, Aditya Pandey, Manju Sonkar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Sonu Dube .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Revenue) Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And 10 Others .....Respondent(s) respondents. 5. We find no good ground to grant the prayer as made in this writ petition. 6. The writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach appropriate court for ensuring his rights of easement. September 9, 2025 Anupam S/- WRIC No. 8624 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench