Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 162154 (ALL)

RAJESHWAR PRASAD SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 7 OTHERS

TACR/76/2025 · 2025-09-09

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW TRANSFER APPLICATION (CRIMINAL) No. - 76 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Pankaj Kumar Singh, the learned counsel for the applicant and Shri S.P. Singh, the learned State Counsel. 2. By means of the instant application filed under Section 407 Cr.P.C., the applicant has prayed for transfer of Crl. Misc. Case No.328 of 2022, titled Rajeshwar Prasad Shukla vs. Devendra Kumar and Ors. arising out of Case Crime No.0213 of 2022, F.I.R. No.57 of 2022 under Sections 302, 504 IPC, Police Station- Cantt, District-Ayodhya/Faizabad, pending in the Court of CJM, Ayodhya/Faizabad to any other Court of competent and equal jurisdiction in a District outside Ayodhya within the State of U.P. 3. The applicant is the complainant in the aforesaid case and the transfer has been sought on the ground that one of the accused person is a practicing Advocate and his uncle is a Nazir in the Court of the Presiding Officer. The complainant himself is an Advocate. He is aware that there is no post of Nazir in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate and it appears that the false averment has been made in para-11 of the affidavit filed in support of the application to give false colour to the case. 4. Merely because one of the accused persons is a practicing Advocate, does not give rise to a ground for transfer of the case Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pankaj Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rajeshwar Prasad Shukla .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 7 Others .....Opposite Party(s) out of the District, more particularly, when the complainant is also a practicing Advocate and the allegation that the uncle of an accused is a Nazir in the Court of the Presiding Officer, is also false. 5. In these circumstances, there is no ground for transferring the case out of the District. 6. The transfer application is hereby dismissed. September 9, 2025 -Amit K- TACR No. 76 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench