Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16215 (CHH)

SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED v. Ramjanam Yadav

MCC/321/2025 · 2025-04-03

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 (MCC No. 321 of 2025) 2025:CGHC:15756 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 321 of 2025 1 - South Eastern Coalfields Limited Through The C.M.D. Headquarter, Seepat Road, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Director Personnel, South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Bilapsur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Chief General Manager P And A, South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattigarh. 4 - Deputy General Manager, Balgi Project, Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh 5 - Sub Area Manager, South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Dhelwadih, Singhali Bhagdeva, Post Katghora, District Korba Chhattisgarh --- Applicant(s) versus 1 - Ramjanam Yadav S/o Shri Dilip Yadav Aged About 52 Years R/o B 22, Balgi Project, Korba, District Korba Chhattsigarh, (Petitioner) 2 - K. Sriniwas Engg. Asstt. C Bilaspur, H Q, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, (Respondent No. 6) --- Non-applicant(s) (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Applicant :- Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate For Non-applicant:- Mr. S.P. Sannat, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Basant Kaiwartya, Advocate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Digitally signed by ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Date: 2025.04.05 12:32:32 +0530 2 (MCC No. 321 of 2025) SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 03.04.2025 1. Heard. 2. This MCC has been filed seeking extension of time for deciding the petitioner’s representation by the respondents, pursuant to order of this Court dated 05.12.2024, passed in WPS No.950/2016. 3. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the materials available on record, further 60 days’ time is granted to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner. 4. Accordingly, this MCC stands disposed off. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge @d!t!