APHC010211542018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 9928/2018 Between: 1. ASIF MOHAMMED, S/O.MD.HABIBULLA, AGE 35 YEARS, OCC. ASST. FINANCE AND AC. OFFICER, C/O.INDIAN INSTITUTE OF OIL PALM RESEARCH, PEDAVEGI, WEST GODAVARI - 534450. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SECY GOVT OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT, GOVT. OF INDIA. 2. GOVT OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL PUBLIC GRIEVANCE AND PENSIONS (DEPT. OF PERSONNEL AND TRAINING), REP. BY ITS SECRETARY 3. SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE, VIJAYAWADA, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR. S.NO.71/1, NH5, NIDAMANURU, VIJAYWADA - 521104 A.P. 4. SELECTION COMMITTEE, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMEN AND DIRECTOR, SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURE, VIJAYAWADA, S.NO.71/1, NH5, NIDAMANURU, VIJAYWADA - 521104, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of respondents 3 and 4 in not selecting the petitioner for Section Officer post in 3rd respondent institute in pursuance of recruitment notification dt.23.2.2017 and declaring as none found suitable in the web site on 18.1.2018 as highly illegal arbitrary and against the circular instructions issued by respondent No.2 and consequently declare that petitioner is entitle for appointment to the post of Section officer in the 3rd respondent institute and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. C VANI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 2 1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ .... to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of respondents 3 and 4 in not selecting the petitioner for Section Officer post in 3rd respondent institute in pursuance of recruitment notification dt.23.2.2017 and declaring as none found suitable in the web site on 18.1.2018 as highly illegal arbitrary and against the circular instructions issued by respondent No.2 and consequently declare that petitioner is entitle for appointment to the post of Section officer in the 3rd respondent institute and pass ....” 2. When the matter is called, none represented for the Petitioner. 3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondents is in attendance. 5. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 9928 of 2018 09.07.2025 Mjl /*