Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 162148 (ALL)

ANUSHRI TRIVEDI v. UNION OF INDIA THRU. PRIN. SECY. MINI. OF FINANCE DEPTT. OF FINANCIA SERVICE NEW DELHI AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/10225/2025 · 2025-09-17

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10225 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. List of fresh cases revised. None appears on behalf of the respondents no. 2 to 5 despite the name of Sri Prabhakar Nath Mishra, Advocate being indicated from the side of the respondents and he having received notices on behalf of the respondents no. 2 to 5. Notice on behalf of the respondent no. 1 has been accepted by the office of the learned Deputy Solicitor General. Heard learned counsel for petitioner. Under challenge is transfer order dated 05.08.2025, a copy of which is annexure no.1 to the petition by which the petitioner has been transferred from district Hardoi to Bahraich. Learned counsel for petitioner has raised various grounds to challenge the impugned transfer order. However the Court is of the view that the said grounds fall in the realm of the grounds to be considered by the respondents themselves at the first instance. Accordingly, without entering into the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to submit a comprehensive Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Praful Vashistha, Ankuri Trivedi, Shivani Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Prabhakar Nath Mishra Anushri Trivedi .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India Thru. Prin. Secy. Mini. Of Finance Deptt. Of Financia Service New Delhi And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) representation against the impugned transfer order dated 05.08.2025 before the competent authority who is said to be the respondent no. 5 within a period of one week from today. In case a representation is made, respondent no. 5 shall proceed to decide the same in accordance with law considering the grounds taken by the petitioner in the representation, which would be decided within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of the representation alongwith copy of this order. Till disposal of representation no coercive action shall be taken by the respondents against the petitioner in pursuance of the impugned transfer order. It is made clear that if the petitioner does not submit her representation within the time specified, then the benefit of this order shall not be available to her. September 17, 2025 Pachhere/- WRIA No. 10225 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench