K.Thulasi Ayyappan v. The Government of Tamil Nadu,
WP(MD)/24360/2025 · 2025-09-10
Anita Sumanth, C Kumarappan
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162147 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162147 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P(MD)No.24360 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.09.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN W.P(MD)No.24360 of 2025 and W.M.P(MD)No.19120 of 2025 K.Thulasi Ayyappan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Housing and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009. 2.The Director, Local Planning Authority, Annasalai, Chennai. 3.The Deputy Director, Town and Country Planning Authority, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 4.The Chairperson, High Level Monitoring Committee, Kanyakumari District. 1/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P(MD)No.24360 of 2025 5.The Assistant Director of Panchayat, District High Level Monitoring Committee, Kanyakumari District. 6.The President, Melasankarankuzhi Panchayat, Rajakkamangalam Union, Kanyakumari District. 7.The Block Development Officer, Village Panchayat, Rajakkamangalam Panchayat Union, Pazhavilai, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records related to the impugned proceedings of the 7th respondent/Block Development Officer (Village Panchayats) Rajakkamangalam Panchayat Union at Pazhavillai, Kanyakumari District dated 03.04.2025 and 11.04.2025 in Na.Ka.No.Aa1/79/2023 and quash the same and consequently issue further directions to the respondents to consider the retention application filed by the petitioner in reference to the additional constructions made by the petitioner in Survey No.146/1, Vembanoor West Village, Agasteeswaram Taluk, Kanyakumari District. 2/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P(MD)No.24360 of 2025 For Petitioner : Mr.N.Dilip Kumar for Mr.H.Elango For RR 1 to 5 : Mr.J.Ashok Additional Government Pleader For RR 6 & 7 : Mr.D.Sadiq Raja Additional Government Pleader
ORDER (Order of the Court was made by DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J.) The petitioner has challenged the proceedings of R7/Block Development Officer dated 03.04.2025 and 11.04.2025. 2.When the matter came up for admission yesterday (09.09.2025), the following order was passed: 'Mr.J.Ashok, learned Additional Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of R1 to R5. Mr.D.Sadiq Raja, learned Additional Government Pleader accepts notice for R6 and R7. 2. The challenge is to a communication dated 11.04.2025, which according to the petitioner, is premature and contrary to the provisions of principles of natural justice, and also bereft of any materials, such as the statute in terms under which it was issued. 3/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P(MD)No.24360 of 2025
3. Mr.Sadiq, would however, draw attention to Form 3 dated 17.04.2025, issued under the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Rules, 2022 to which, according to him, there has been no response. 4. Since Mr.N.Dilipkumar, learned counsel for the petitioner is unaware of the notice dated 17.04.2025, let a copy of the same be supplied to him along with acknowledgement, in order to enable him to take instructions. 5. List on 10.09.2025.' 3.Today, Mr.N.Dilip Kumar, learned counsel appearing for petitioner, on instructions, would submit that notice dated 17.04.2025 had, in fact, been received by the petitioner. The writ affidavit does not disclose the receipt of notice dated 17.04.2025 and this is hence, serious omission. 4.In fact, as the respondents rightly point out, the notice was sent by RPAD and acknowledgement of receipt has been placed before us by way of a compilation today. 4/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P(MD)No.24360 of 2025 5.However, dehors that, we prefer to close this Writ Petition. The impugned communications dated 03.04.2025 and 11.04.2025 are of little relevance now, since notice has been issued in Form III on 17.04.2025, to which the petitioner will have to respond. 6.In view of the above, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. [A.S.M.J.,] & [C.K.J.,] 10.09.2025
NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes ps 5/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P(MD)No.24360 of 2025 To 1.The Housing and Urban Development Department, Represented by the Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009. 2.The Director, Local Planning Authority, Annasalai, Chennai. 3.The Deputy Director, Town and Country Planning Authority, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 4.The Chairperson, High Level Monitoring Committee, Kanyakumari District. 5.The Assistant Director of Panchayat, District High Level Monitoring Committee, Kanyakumari District.
6.The President, Melasankarankuzhi Panchayat, Rajakkamangalam Union, Kanyakumari District. 7.The Block Development Officer, Village Panchayat, Rajakkamangalam Panchayat Union, Pazhavilai, Kanyakumari District. 6/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P(MD)No.24360 of 2025 DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J. AND C.KUMARAPPAN, J. ps W.P(MD)No.24360 of 2025 10.09.2025 7/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis