PRADEEP KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE DISTT. AMETHI AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/8646/2025 · 2025-09-09
Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162131 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162131 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8646 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J.
HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel, who appears for the State-opposite parties and perused the record.
2. This writ petition has been filed by petitioner with following main prayer(s):
"(i) issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties 1 & 2 appropriate action against the opposite parties No. 3 to 5 not to interfere in peaceful possession of the petitioner of 1/4 share of Ancestral immovable Property. (ii) issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party No.1 to consider and decide the application dated 19.8.2025, contained as Annexure No.3 to this writ petition."
3. We have gone through the petitioner's application dated 19.08.2025 and also the pleadings on record. It appears that there is a dispute regarding the possession of ancestral house between the petitioner and the private opposite parties, who appear to be collateral of the petitioner.
4. We cannot issue a direction as prayed in this writ petition.
5. The writ petition is dismissed. September 9, 2025 Anupam S/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prem Chandra Chauhan, Kashi Ram Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Pradeep Kumar Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. District Magistrate Distt. Amethi And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench