APHC010211962010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL Between: Bandika Jagadeesh, S/o.B.Nagendra AND Kamaralli Sreedevi @ Jahnavi, D/o.Gopala Krishna Counsel for the Petitioner Counsel for the Respondent The Court made the following At the time of considering the matter, the learned counsel for the respondent placed a copy of the Award dated 16.12.2020 passed by the Lok Adalat Bench at Kurnool. A that the parties have settled the matter, in terms of the compromise entered into between them. In view of the above stated position and as there is no representation on behalf of the appellant, we are inclined to close the matter as no further orders are necessary in this appeal. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) DAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.437 of 2010 Bandika Jagadeesh, S/o.B.Nagendra … Petitioner Kamaralli Sreedevi @ Jahnavi, D/o.Gopala Krishna … Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr.G.Manohar Respondent : Mr.J.Janaki Rami Reddy The Court made the following JUDGMENT: (per NJS,J) At the time of considering the matter, the learned counsel for the respondent placed a copy of the Award dated 16.12.2020 passed by the Lok Adalat Bench at Kurnool. As seen from the same, it would appear that the parties have settled the matter, in terms of the compromise entered into between them. In view of the above stated position and as there is no representation on behalf of the appellant, we are inclined to se the matter as no further orders are necessary in this appeal. [3526] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Petitioner Respondent At the time of considering the matter, the learned counsel for the respondent placed a copy of the Award dated 16.12.2020 passed by the s seen from the same, it would appear that the parties have settled the matter, in terms of the compromise entered into between them. In view of the above stated position and as there is no representation on behalf of the appellant, we are inclined to se the matter as no further orders are necessary in this appeal. 2 2. Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is closed. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA,J _____________________________________ TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO,J July 30, 2025 vasu