SMT. SARITA SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. BAL VIKAS EVAM PUSTAHAR LKO AND 5 OTHERS
WRIA/10197/2025 · 2025-09-04
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162129 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162129 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10197 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and Mr. Jogendra Nath Verma, learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed challenging orders dated 05.07.2025 and 04.08.2025 whereby petitioner's representation for continuance on the post of Aganbadi Worker has been rejected.
3. Learned State Counsel, at the very outset, has a raised preliminary objection regarding maintainability of this petition in view of the fact that petitioner had earlier also filed Writ-A No. 7556 of 2025 challenging the same orders. It is submitted that the order dated 05.07.2025 has been passed cancelling petitioner's appointment on the post of Aganbadi Worker since her Income Certificate, which was the basis of her appointment was cancelled.
4. Learned counsel for petitioner was unable to rebut the aforesaid assertion.
5. In view thereof, the present writ petition being a second writ petition with regard to the same cause of action is, therefore, barred in terms of Chapter- XXII Rule-7 of the Allahabad High Court Rules of the Allahabad High Court Rules and is, therefore, dismissed. Parties to bear own cost. September 4, 2025 Satish Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Achal Gupta, Anil Kishore Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Smt. Sarita Sharma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Bal Vikas Evam Pustahar Lko And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench