Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 162119 (ALL)

KRISHNA KUMAR v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER JUDICIAL, AYODHYA MANDAL, AYODHYA AND 4 OTHERS

A227/5298/2025 · 2025-09-04

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5298 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel on behalf of respondents no.1 and 5 and Shri Mohan Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.4. 2. In view of the proposed order to be passed, notice to respondents no. 2 and 3, is dispensed with. 3. Present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer to direct the respondent no.1 to decide the Revision No. C202504000002356 "Krishna Kumar Vs. Kallu and others filed by the petitioner on dated 1.08.2025 within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court as contained in as Annexure No.1 tot his petition. 4. It has been submitted that the suit filed by the petitioner before the Additional District Magistrate (Finance and Revenue), Amethi which was dismissed by him vide its order dated 10.07.2025. Against the aforesaid order the petitioner has filed the revision before the opposite party no.1, which is pending for its decision. It has been stated that the matter is urgent and a perusal of the questionnaire clearly indicates that though the case is regularly listed but it is routinely adjourned on one pretext or the other. 4. It is noticed that the instant matter relates to 2025 and the trial courts Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Neeraj Kumar Chaturvedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Krishna Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Additional Commissioner Judicial, Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) are heavily burdened with the dockets due to which large number of cases are pending before them. In the present case, no extraordinary circumstance has been indicated by the petitioner so as to interfere and pass orders for expeditious disposal of the revision which has been filed only in 2025. Accordingly, no case for interference is made out at this stage. 5. However, looking to the aforesaid circumstances, liberty is granted to the petitioner to move appropriate application before the trial court within next two weeks for expediting the proceedings. In case, such an application is made, the trail court shall consider and decide the same within two weeks thereafter by a reasoned and speaking order. In case, the trial court finds that a case for urgency has been made out, it shall proceed to consider and decide the case of the petitioner expeditiously. 6. With aforesaid direction the petition stands disposed of. September 4, 2025 Muk A227 No. 5298 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench